Montana lawmakers are considering a bill that would require the state Board of Regents to adopt a policy on accepting money or other gifts for the state’s colleges and universities.
Both the University of Montana and Montana State University have benefited from multi-million dollar gifts that resulted in naming rights.
Last year’s $8 million gift by the Gianforte Family Trust came as Greg Gianforte, a Bozeman high tech entrepreneur, was the Republican nominee for governor in 2016.
Four students from MSU spoke in favor of Senate Bill 211. They were all critical of the decision to rename the Computer Science Department on the Bozeman campus to the Gianforte School of Computing.
“I work closely with students of computer science,” says Molly Baird, a student of mathematics. “After the renaming of the school of computer science there was a palpable change in the atmosphere of my classes.”
Baird, who identified herself as a member of the LGBTQ community, says the renaming sent 2 very clear messages to MSU students and to the residents of Montana.
“Students are objects to be bought and some political affiliations are more worthy of education depending on their ability to pay. This is absolutely unacceptable,” she says.
Some of the students have also traveled and testified before recent Board of Regents meetings on this topic.
No one spoke against the bill. There were no representatives from the campuses or the Commissioner of Higher Education present at the hearing before the Senate Education and Cultural Resources Committee.
Senator Diane Sands, D-Missoula, is the sponsor of Senate Bill 211. She says this bill is not aimed at any campus or any particular donation.
“And I just ask the regents when they’re considering a naming policies remember that they’re public assets, public buildings and they develop a policy that both deals with the timeliness issue,” Sands says. She also says this includes, “Not naming buildings inappropriately after people who are currently in office or running for office. That we have full transparency in that process with adequate time for people to comment.”
Sands says the final decision will still rest with the Regents, after they develop a policy.
The Senate Education and Cultural Resources Committee did not take immediate action on the bill.